Comments on: Google’s Classification Algorithms http://contempt.me/googles-classification-algorithms/ Getting Ranked ... And Everything After Mon, 16 Apr 2012 04:16:17 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2 By: whataboutblog.com http://contempt.me/googles-classification-algorithms/comment-page-1/#comment-12297 whataboutblog.com Mon, 04 Apr 2011 17:47:02 +0000 http://contempt.me/?p=272#comment-12297 I loved this article. I never thought of Google looking at not just links, but traffic from links when considering whether to dump a site in the sandbox. Makes sense though, and made me reevaluate a few things, so thanks. I loved this article. I never thought of Google looking at not just links, but traffic from links when considering whether to dump a site in the sandbox. Makes sense though, and made me reevaluate a few things, so thanks.

]]> By: Contempt http://contempt.me/googles-classification-algorithms/comment-page-1/#comment-7360 Contempt Tue, 27 Jul 2010 20:18:04 +0000 http://contempt.me/?p=272#comment-7360 Yeah it got a lot higher with auth links. Auth ftw. I always use a mix of different types of link building within all of my sites now, it's a lot easier to avoid it almost entirely. Yeah it got a lot higher with auth links. Auth ftw.

I always use a mix of different types of link building within all of my sites now, it’s a lot easier to avoid it almost entirely.

]]> By: SEO hosting http://contempt.me/googles-classification-algorithms/comment-page-1/#comment-7045 SEO hosting Sun, 11 Jul 2010 09:32:43 +0000 http://contempt.me/?p=272#comment-7045 "I threw 50 or 100ish PR2-5 at it and I got kicked to 200+ for the same term. What the hell, right?" You mentioned that your site got kicked, however, I'm curious to know whether it got back up(stronger and higher) after a few days? In my experience when I lose rankings for a few sudden links thrown at my sites, they lose rankings for a few days and jump back up. I've never seen any of my site lose rankings because of too many incoming links suddenly. Ofcourse, xRumer has caused problems for me but those links are really spammy. However, regular legit looking links have never been a problem for me, 200-500, definitely not. “I threw 50 or 100ish PR2-5 at it and I got kicked to 200+ for the same term. What the hell, right?”

You mentioned that your site got kicked, however, I’m curious to know whether it got back up(stronger and higher) after a few days?
In my experience when I lose rankings for a few sudden links thrown at my sites, they lose rankings for a few days and jump back up.
I’ve never seen any of my site lose rankings because of too many incoming links suddenly.

Ofcourse, xRumer has caused problems for me but those links are really spammy. However, regular legit looking links have never been a problem for me, 200-500, definitely not.

]]> By: yhelapy http://contempt.me/googles-classification-algorithms/comment-page-1/#comment-4875 yhelapy Fri, 15 Jan 2010 03:01:49 +0000 http://contempt.me/?p=272#comment-4875 <strong>yhelapy...</strong> <a href="http://mp3my.biz/performer/albums/uk/106597/1/" rel="nofollow">Download mp3 with UK </a>... yhelapy…

Download mp3 with UK …

]]> By: List Building Blog http://contempt.me/googles-classification-algorithms/comment-page-1/#comment-3452 List Building Blog Wed, 09 Sep 2009 09:12:42 +0000 http://contempt.me/?p=272#comment-3452 "Links From Related Sites Are More Powerful" This strikes me most. Cos that is basically true in the field of SEO.. Linking to a site related to yours will make more advantage... “Links From Related Sites Are More Powerful”

This strikes me most. Cos that is basically true in the field of SEO.. Linking to a site related to yours will make more advantage…

]]> By: axi http://contempt.me/googles-classification-algorithms/comment-page-1/#comment-3373 axi Sat, 22 Aug 2009 22:48:11 +0000 http://contempt.me/?p=272#comment-3373 I have a doubt since while concerning to some exact keyword searches penalties. For example, I have one site related to wireless networks, and if you search "wifi networks" it doesn't appears in results or appears in +600 position, and if you search "wifi wireless networks" it is first in ranking because that term have a lot of exact anchors. Or for example my domain name have wifi keyword, ando all of the links to my site have wifi keyword in their anchors, but if you search "wifi" my site don't appear on that search. The obvius thougt is related to the competitivy of the keywords, but sometimes this is not always true, for example "wifi networks" is not very competitive search in my language. No keyword stuffing.. no bh techniques, it just happens. This kind of penalties ( or maybe they aren't penalties, and are indexation techniques ) dissapear with time? Do you have experience with this? Thanks in advance I have a doubt since while concerning to some exact keyword searches penalties.
For example, I have one site related to wireless networks, and
if you search “wifi networks” it doesn’t appears in results or appears in +600 position, and if you search “wifi wireless networks” it is first in ranking because that term have a lot of exact anchors.
Or for example my domain name have wifi keyword, ando all of the links to my site have wifi keyword in their anchors, but if you search “wifi” my site don’t appear on that search.

The obvius thougt is related to the competitivy of the keywords, but sometimes this is not always true, for example “wifi networks” is not very competitive search in my language.
No keyword stuffing.. no bh techniques, it just happens.

This kind of penalties ( or maybe they aren’t penalties, and are indexation techniques ) dissapear with time? Do you have experience with this?

Thanks in advance

]]> By: Contempt http://contempt.me/googles-classification-algorithms/comment-page-1/#comment-3359 Contempt Thu, 20 Aug 2009 13:57:56 +0000 http://contempt.me/?p=272#comment-3359 Using translations as content "spinning" is nothing new. To be honest, as long as I've been doing this I've known about that one. But yeah, in my opinion - though I haven't completely tested it - they can tell the difference depending on who spiders it. In other words, Google.com spiders english and spanish is different than if Google.com and Google.com.mx spiders it. Using translations as content “spinning” is nothing new. To be honest, as long as I’ve been doing this I’ve known about that one. But yeah, in my opinion – though I haven’t completely tested it – they can tell the difference depending on who spiders it. In other words, Google.com spiders english and spanish is different than if Google.com and Google.com.mx spiders it.

]]> By: axi http://contempt.me/googles-classification-algorithms/comment-page-1/#comment-3355 axi Thu, 20 Aug 2009 03:43:35 +0000 http://contempt.me/?p=272#comment-3355 Hi, first excuse my poor English. I read some of your articles, and some are quite interesting. I am curious in what do you think about content translations. For example if I have a french site of movies, I can scrap content from amazon reviews or editorial opinions, translate, and put on my site. I tried in the past a little test, but google seems to detect those traductions. What do you think? Did you test something like that? Hi,
first excuse my poor English. I read some of your articles, and some are quite interesting.
I am curious in what do you think about content translations.
For example if I have a french site of movies, I can scrap content from amazon reviews or editorial opinions, translate, and put on my site.
I tried in the past a little test, but google seems to detect those traductions.

What do you think? Did you test something like that?

]]> By: Contempt http://contempt.me/googles-classification-algorithms/comment-page-1/#comment-3239 Contempt Sat, 01 Aug 2009 21:15:12 +0000 http://contempt.me/?p=272#comment-3239 To an extent, yes. I agree completely with the point you make about relevant. We'll talk tomorrow if you can message me on Skype I'll show you what I mean. There's a few factors that I can't write about that shows exactly what merits links and what doesn't. :) To an extent, yes. I agree completely with the point you make about relevant. We’ll talk tomorrow if you can message me on Skype I’ll show you what I mean. There’s a few factors that I can’t write about that shows exactly what merits links and what doesn’t. :)

]]> By: Victory http://contempt.me/googles-classification-algorithms/comment-page-1/#comment-3238 Victory Sat, 01 Aug 2009 20:50:19 +0000 http://contempt.me/?p=272#comment-3238 Links to fast is bad if your content doesn't merit it. It seems like people have this delusion that G takes the same number of CPU cycles for each page that it visits, which is patently untrue. In reality G is going to scrutinize your site more if it seems to be more relevant at the moment. Relevant at the moment can be guessed upon via the number of new links that are pointing to it. So if you get to many links to fast, than G is going to through many many CPU cycles to see if your page is really something it should really be getting out to its users. If not or if those links are crap, well then G can guess why you are getting them. Links to fast is bad if your content doesn’t merit it. It seems like people have this delusion that G takes the same number of CPU cycles for each page that it visits, which is patently untrue.

In reality G is going to scrutinize your site more if it seems to be more relevant at the moment. Relevant at the moment can be guessed upon via the number of new links that are pointing to it.

So if you get to many links to fast, than G is going to through many many CPU cycles to see if your page is really something it should really be getting out to its users. If not or if those links are crap, well then G can guess why you are getting them.

]]>